Archive for month: April, 2018

Grow Food, Grow Jobs: How Broadband Can Boost Farming in California’s Central Valley

Original Article

The Central Valley of California is an enormous economic force, producing over one-third of the nation’s vegetables, two-thirds of its fruit and nuts, and contributing billions of dollars annually to the California economy. Unfortunately, many of California’s farming communities still lack reliable broadband Internet access. This lack prevents farmers from using cutting-edge technologies and real-time data inputs that would improve agricultural production, and severely hampers educational opportunities that support farming and growth. A particularly acute example of this is in the western Central Valley, where less than half of the population has access to broadband, the median income is $20,289, and agriculture is a leading economic driver. Government, education, and industry leaders in the area are working to provide communities with the resources they need to grow food as well as jobs.

Robert Tse, the California Rural Broadband Development Coordinator for the USDA and longtime organizer for California’s agricultural community, imagines what farmers can accomplish with greater connectivity. While working with technology developers and farmers, Robert has seen first-hand the benefits technology can bring. “When moisture sensors are deployed in fields,” Tse said, “agricultural economists have found that farmers can realize a 10 to 20% decrease in water use as well as a significant increase in field output.” In a state plagued by drought, using less water to grow more food is a major improvement. Benefits like these would have an immediate impact on farming communities and overall production. But, without broadband connectivity, such tools remain out of reach for many farmers.

Expanding connectivity also enables the dissemination of real-time information, like weather predictions and experimental approaches to crop management. One of the main missions of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources (UC ANR) is to provide farmers with up-to-date science and information. Gabe Youtsey, UC ANR’s chief innovation officer, emphasized how improved connectivity would further UC ANR’s mission: “To fulfill our education mission, research centers host local farmers at meetings and field days. With connectivity, those that live too far away to travel will be able to receive real-time video streams. Also, online learning can significantly expand the reach and impact of the 200 locally based cooperative extension advisors and specialists.” Several of UC ANR’s facilities now have broadband after being hooked up to the CalREN fiber backbone.

Vice Chancellor Linda Thomas of the West Hills Community College District is particularly in tune with the need for broadband access in conjunction with education. In her presentation at the 2018 CENIC annual conference, she cited the Brookings Institution’s summary of the impact poor connectivity has on education: “Rural communities are less likely to efficiently provide Internet access to students in public schools, as most rural schools lack access to high-speed fiber and pay more than twice as much for bandwidth. In a growing world of personalized online curricula, Internet-based research, and online testing, this severely restricts rural students from educational opportunities their urban counterparts may enjoy.” West Hills Community College offers academic degrees like agriculture science technology and irrigation engineering technology. These programs teach students to use cutting-edge farming technology and software, but operation of such tools requires fast, efficient broadband.

Yet extending access to these rural areas is often neglected, due to last-mile and middle-mile challenges. Laying fiber cable in the ground is not feasible in many places that remain disconnected. That’s where CEO Skyler Ditchfield and his company GeoLinks come in. GeoLinks is trailblazing the use of fixed wireless technologies to expand access with approaches that require less time and less infrastructure. “It can be difficult to meet the broadband needs of rural California with fiber connections alone,” said Ditchfield. “Fixed wireless broadband can meet the data needs, fiscal demands, and timeline to deploy these critical technologies across California.” GeoLinks uses solar and wind technologies to power carefully sited wireless towers that form a grid of connectivity across a community.

Now that wireless extension approaches have evolved enough to provide quality, reliable broadband to rural areas, the challenge is organizing community partners for widespread implementation. CENIC is partnering with organizations — as it has done with UC ANR, GeoLinks, and others — to develop plans for better connectivity, find funding to extend a wireless mesh into the unlinked reaches of the state, and ultimately help more farmers grow food and jobs. As Gabe Youtsey noted, “California communities must take control of their broadband future to ensure that everyone can participate in our digital economy by partnering to create new technologies and business models.”

Watch plenary panels and check out more content from the 2018 CENIC Annual Conference.

GeoLinks, MegaPort Form Partnership

PRESS RELEASE — CHANNEL PARTNERS CONFERENCE & EXPO — April 18, 2018 — GeoLinks (booth #4041) is pleased to announce to the channel its new partnership with Megaport (booth #4046 and a Featured Sponsor), global provider of Elastic Interconnection services. Kicking off at Channel Partners Conference and Expo April 17th through 20th in Las Vegas, Nevada, with a single Megaport connection GeoLinks’ clients will now have secure, on demand access to:

  • The world’s leading public clouds including Azure, AWS, Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud, IBM Cloud, Salesforce, and Google Cloud Platform
  • New options and flexible service models for building hybrid cloud solutions
  • An ecosystem of 250+ service providers
  • On-demand connections between over 200 data centres globally
  • Peer traffic on Megaport’s Internet Exchange.
  • Control and manageability of services anywhere, anytime, on all major platforms

GeoLinks views the partnership as an opportunity for its agents to bundle Cloud Onramping with a variety of its new and pre-existing products and services to enhance overall client offerings. “Our ultimate goal is to be the industry’s go-to technical resource for all things telecom. Thus, we want to empower our partners to offer robust solutions to their clients by knowing that GeoLinks will provide them with impeccable service and a singular project manager across all platforms. Our partnership with Megaport further enhances our overall product portfolio enabling agents to service businesses of all sizes. Specifically, we foresee Cloud On-ramping being a great opportunity to bundle alongside our ClearFiber™, SD-WAN and Hosted Voice solutions.” said GeoLinks’ Chief Strategy Officer Phillip Deneef.

To learn more about the partnership or product offering, stop by GeoLinks’ Booth 4041 or schedule a 1:1 meeting with GeoLinks’ leadership in the Company’s private meeting suite during the upcoming Channel Partners Conference and Expo. For questions or meeting requests please contact Lexie Olson, at [email protected].

About GeoLinks
Headquartered in Southern California, GeoLinks is a leading telecommunications company and competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) public utility, nationally recognized for its innovative Internet and Hosted Voice solutions. Ranked No. 5 by category on Inc. Magazine’s 2017 Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Companies in America, GeoLinks delivers Enterprise-Grade Internet, Hosted Voice, SD-WAN, Cloud On-ramping, Layer 2 Transport, and both Public and Private Turnkey Network Construction expertly tailored for businesses and Anchor Institutions nationwide.

GeoLinks’ accelerated success is largely due to its flagship product, ClearFiberTM, which offers dedicated business-class Internet with unlimited bandwidth, true network redundancy, and guaranteed speeds reaching up to 10 Gbps. Named “Most Disruptive Technology” in the 2018 Central Coast Innovation Awards, GeoLinks’ ClearFiberTM network is backed by a carrier-grade Service Level Agreement boasting 99.999% uptime and 24/7 in-house customer support. With an average installation period of 4 to 7 days, GeoLinks is proud to offer the most resilient and scalable fixed wireless network on the market.

About Megaport
Megaport Limited is the global leading provider of Elastic Interconnection services. Using Software Defined Networking (SDN), the Company’s platform enables customers to rapidly connect their network to other services across the Megaport Network. Services can be directly controlled by customers via mobile devices, their computer, or our open API. Megaport connects over 900 customers in more than 200 data centres globally. Megaport is an Alibaba Cloud Technology Partner, Oracle Cloud Partner, AWS Technology Partner, AWS Networking Competency Partner, Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute Partner, Google Cloud Interconnect Partner, and IBM Direct Link Cloud Exchange provider, and Salesforce Express Connect Partner.

Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Modifications to the CASF



Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Modifications to the California Advanced Services Fund.  | Rulemaking No. 12-10-012 (Filed October 25, 2012)




California Internet, L.P. (U-7326-C) dba GeoLinks (“GeoLinks” or the “Company”) respectfully submits these opening comments on the Phase II Staff Proposal set forth in the February 14, 2018 Amended Scoping Memo and Assigned Commissioner’s Ruling (“Ruling”).

Headquartered in Camarillo, CA, GeoLinks is nationally recognized for its innovative Internet and Hosted Voice solutions.  The Company’s proprietary ClearFiber™ product utilizes a combination of terrestrial fiber optic backhaul, carrier-grade full-duplex fixed wireless equipment, and FCC licensed spectrum to deliver ultra-reliable high-speed broadband Internet access via radio waves.[1]

GeoLinks was the largest construction grant winner for California K-12 schools and libraries in both 2016 and 2017, providing highspeed broadband to nearly 30 rural school districts and surrounding communities throughout the state that previously had not had access to any high-speed broadband service. The Company hopes to leverage its expertise in connecting unserved areas of the state to apply for California Advanced Services Fund (“CASF”) funding in the coming year.


A. The Commission Should Allow Flexibility in How CASF Applicants Provide Project Location Data

In its proposal, Staff proposes that CASF Applicants provide, among other things, the following with respect to project location data:

  • The geographic location of the project related key network equipment, such as: DSLAMs, wireless towers, router facilities, network interconnection, etcetera. (Format to be determined by Staff)[2]

In finalizing the format for such a requirement, GeoLinks urges the Commission to allow for flexibility in the provision of this information between the application and construction phases of the CASF process.  GeoLinks recommends that for the application phase Staff require this information by census area from CASF applicants.  Providing infrastructure location information by census area provides staff with mappable infrastructure data while ensuring maximum flexibility for network design.  Especially for competitive providers that are not limited by fiber construction requirements, the exact locations for certain pieces of network infrastructure (i.e. towers or receivers) may shift during the construction phase to account for land procurement, leasing, permitting, topography and vegetation, etc.  Moreover, requiring this information at a more granular level at the application phase may result in delays if an applicant has to seek approval of any changes, even if the resulting network functions exactly the same.  For these reasons, GeoLinks urges the Commission to seek this information at a census area level as part of the CASF application process.

B. The Per Household Threshold for Ministerial Review Should be the Same Regardless of Technology Type

In the Proposal, Staff addresses the approval delays that have, to date, been commonplace in the CASF program.[3]  Specifically, Staff addresses that the majority of projects take several years before approval is granted, creating opportunities for new challenges and problems.  To streamline the approval process, Staff recommends ministerial review process for applications that meet certain criteria.[4]

As an initial matter, GeoLinks supports Staff’s proposal to create a ministerial review process for certain projects.  The Company believes that such a process will reserve Commission resources and ensure that broadband deployment to unserved areas is completed on a more expedited basis.  In addition, GeoLinks believes such a process will encourage more participation in the CASF program as companies will no longer be faced with the open-ended uncertainty of when a project might get approved.  However, GeoLinks asserts that the per household cost thresholds Staff proposes for this ministerial review process will thwart Staff’s efforts to streamline the program and incentivize carriers to bid on these low-income areas.

As proposed, the process set forth for low-income communities creates a huge disparity between technology types.  Specifically, Staff proposes allowing this streamlined process for fixed wireless projects only if proposed project costs are $1,285 per household or less.  However, for the same project area (and likely the same offered speeds, prices, customer service, etc.), Staff proposes an allowable project cost of $15,650 per household for fiber builds – more than 12x the amount allowed for fixed wireless projects.[5]  Moreover, there is no limit proposed for satellite providers, assuming they are eligible to bid.

On its face, this discrepancy is contrary to the Commission’s stated goal of administering the CASF program on a “technology neutral” basis.[6]  While not clear from Staff’s proposal, GeoLinks believes these numbers may be based on amounts approved for projects in the past.  However, these numbers should be used as a mechanism to reevaluate the per household costs the Commission has historically awarded to broadband providers, not as a method by which to hinder certain technology-types from bidding on a CASF-eligible area.

For example, if a fixed wireless provider applies to provide high-speed broadband to households in a CASF-eligible, low-income area of the state for $1500 per household, that fixed wireless provider should not be precluded from the ministerial process when a fiber-based project, that will likely offer the same speeds, would be eligible – and for potentially upwards of $14,000 more PER HOUSEHOLD.

The proposed price discrepancy gives fiber providers a huge advantage and will only serve to disincentivize competitive providers from submitting CASF applications for areas where the cost threshold might be more than $1,285 per household.  In addition, a provider that submitted an application for slightly more than the threshold for fixed wireless would run the risk of being beat out by a fiber provider offering to deploy service for 12x the cost because they can get approved in a shorter period of time under the ministerial process.  This structure not only picks winners and losers in the CASF application process but encourages wasteful spending that could have be avoided if other technology types were given an equal opportunity for expedited application review.  Certainly, as proposed, this discrepancy fails meet the Assigned Commissioner’s stated goal to “consider appropriate administrative controls to ensure that funds granted to eligible applicants are administered efficiently and cost-effectively, consistent with the Account’s stated purposes and objectives.”[7]

Instead, GeoLinks urges the Commission to set a flat cost per household threshold for its ministerial review process that would apply to all CASF applicants, regardless of technology type.  Not only will this flat per household amount simplify the review process, but it will set all service providers on equal footing for ministerial review, ensuring maximum participation in the CASF program and promoting more efficient use of CASF funds.

C. GeoLinks supports Staff’s Proposal to Initiate a Request for Proposal Process “High-Priority” Areas but Urges Staff to Reevaluate Whether These Areas Are Still CASF-Eligible

Staff proposes implementing a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) process for “high-priority” areas where no applications have been received.  GeoLinks strongly supports Staff’s suggestion to implement an RFP process for these areas.  However, in doing so, GeoLinks urges the Commission to direct Staff to reevaluate the priority areas to assess census blocks that are currently available for CASF funding.

Earlier this year, GeoLinks was in the process of finalizing a CASF Application for several localities within the Salinas Valley area, all of which are listed as priority areas on the Commission’s website.[8]  However, between the changes implemented by Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1665[9] and new projects in the area (which were not previously reflected on the California Broadband Map), the area appears to be all but ineligible for CASF funding.  And the areas that remain cannot be served by a non-incumbent carrier without requiring a huge cost per household.  While GeoLinks has not analyzed all of the “priority areas” designated by the Commission, it stands to reason that a refresh of these areas may be necessary.  With specific guidance and direction for eligible areas in conjunction with a streamlined, ministerial review process, GeoLinks believes that the RFP process will yield numerous bidders and revitalize broadband deployment efforts in these priority areas.  Specifically, GeoLinks urges the Commission to update the California Broadband map to account for any changes that may impact high-priority areas (or any CASF-eligible areas), including awarded CASF grants, Commission-approved settlement agreements pursuant to merger transactions, other federal and state grant funding, etc., and to do so more expeditiously going forward

In addition, similar to the process recommended above, GeoLinks suggests that carriers be placed on equal footing with respect to eligibility to bid on these RFPs.  Specifically, GeoLinks urges the Commission to score applications based on the same criteria, regardless of technology type, and suggests a flat per household threshold for ministerial review, applicable to all applicants.

D. The Commission Should Create Rules for Right of First Refusal Submissions to Avoid the Process Becoming a Mechanism for Blocking Competition

GeoLinks urges the Commission to implement rules to ensure carriers do not use the Right of First Refusal (“ROFR”) process to block areas where they have no intention to deploy broadband infrastructure.  First, GeoLinks urges the Commission to implement rules that limit a carrier’s ability to file multiple ROFR letters for the same area.  If a carrier files an ROFR for an area, it has 180 days to either deploy broadband/ upgrade its existing facilities or seek an extension.  If after the exhaustion of the initial 180-day period or any granted extension the provider has failed to deploy or upgrade its facilities as set forth in the ROFR, the carrier should not be allowed to re-bid the area in any subsequent round.   Second, GeoLinks believes that repeated extensions are only reasonable if the delay is completely outside the control of the ROFR filer.  Delays due to inability to secure funding, reasonably avoidable construction delays, etc. should not suffice.  Lastly, the Commission should consider penalties for failure to never construct an ROFR area after seeking an extension such as preclusion from participating in the CASF program.

E. Connect America Fund Recipients Should be Subject to Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Becoming Eligible to Apply for CASF Funding.

As set forth in AB 1665, Connection America Fund Phase II (“CAF”) areas are ineligible for CASF funding until July 1, 2020, unless the existing facility-based broadband provider has notified the Commission before July 1, 2020, that it has either completed or elected not to build its CAF deployment in the census block.  In its Proposal, Staff seeks comment on the following:

  1. How can the Commission incentivize existing facilities based broadband providers to build out their CAF II obligations in a timely manner?
  2. How and what is the process for existing providers to notify the Commission before July 1, 2020, that it has either completed or elected not to build its CAF [project] to expand broadband service within identified census blocks?[10]

As an initial matter, in adopting any rules related to the treatment of CAF recipients, GeoLinks urges the Commission to remember that these recipients made commitments to the FCC in exchange for receipt of CAF funds.  Specifically, these providers agreed that in exchange for the model-based support they would “deploy voice and broadband-capable networks to all supported locations that are deemed ‘high-cost’ and not served by an unsubsidized competitor.”[11]  If a CAF recipient fails to meet these commitments (either by only completing a portion of an area or not completing an area at all), the Commission should not allow them to game the system and benefit from CASF funding.

By way of example, recently Frontier Communications informed the Commission that it would not be pursuing a specific CAF area (Desert Shores).[12]  The very next day, however, Frontier filed a CASF application for the exact same area.[13]  Based on Frontier’s CAF commitment, Staff flagged the Desert Shores area as ineligible for CASF funding.  This blocked all other broadband providers from seeking CASF funding to serve the Desert Shores area.

Clearly, Frontier waited to announce that it would not be using CAF funding for Desert Shores until its CASF application was complete (since that filing occurred the next day).  Meaning that Frontier not only knew in advance it would not be upholding its commitments under CAF but withheld that information from the Commission for its own benefit.  This behavior should not be rewarded and is most certainly not in the public interest.

To avoid this gaming of the CASF program in the future, GeoLinks urges the Commission to subject CAF providers that bow out of their FCC commitments under the CAF program to a mandatory waiting period before they can apply for CASF funding for a previously blocked CAF area.  Specifically, GeoLinks suggests a 90-day mandatory waiting period if notice is provided to the Commission before January 1, 2019 and a 180-day mandatory waiting period if notice is provided to the Commission after January 1, 2019 but before January 1, 2020.  However, if a provider waits until after January 1, 2020, the Commission should completely preclude the provider from applying for CASF funds for the same area.  Moreover, the Commission should consider subjecting any CAF recipient who waits until after January 1, 2020 to inform the Commission of its election not to complete its deployment commitments in a CAF area to a Rule 1.1 violation. Given the time necessary to plan and deploy a broadband network, if a recipient has not begun deployment or made significant steps towards deployment with only 6 months remaining before the July 1, 2020 deadline, it can be inferred that the recipient had no intention of deploying broadband to that area and withheld such information from the Commission constituting misleading “the Commission or its staff by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.”[14]

For these reasons, GeoLinks strongly urges the Commission to develop rules that preclude CAF recipients from gaming the CASF program in their favor.

F. The Commission Should Allow an Additional CASF Application Submission Period Each Calendar Year

In its Proposal, Staff seeks input on timing for CASF submissions, asking the following:

  1. Should an additional CASF grant application opportunity be afforded following the July 31st ROFR completion dates, thereby permitting submission of applications every 180 days? How will this affect prioritization of projects?

GeoLinks supports an additional annual grant application opportunity for a number of reasons.  First, this bi-annual submission process will maximize efficient administration of the CASF program.  A new submission deadline every 6-months will help ensure that application review stays on track for expedited processing.  Paired with the new ministerial processes that Staff has proposed, CASF application review will become more streamlined and allow for the assessment of a second round of applications within a calendar year.

Second, the bi-annual application deadline will incentivize more service providers to participate in the CASF program, as they can plan their CASF application(s) to align better with pre-planned company expenditures or resource allocations.  For example, smaller companies may have finite network design and deployment resources to dedicate to large builds.  If those resources are tied up in a large project for the first half of the year but not the latter half of the year, a company may be precluded from applying for a CASF grant until the next annual deadline.  This could ultimately disincentivize the company to apply at all.   However, if a bi-annual application process was implemented, these broadband providers would have the flexibility to time a CASF application in a way that best aligns with their resource allocation plans.  As the Commission seeks to incentivize more participation in the CASF program, GeoLinks believes a second annual submission deadline would further this goal.

G. The Commission Should Implement Technology Neutral Scoring Criteria

In its Proposal, Staff recommends revising certain scoring criteria to give greater weight to projects in areas that are “low-income” or “high-priority.”[15]  GeoLinks supports this shift in scoring criteria as a way to incentivize projects geared towards these areas.  That said, GeoLinks asserts that staff should not assess points associated with pricing in the same way proposed in Section 1.7 of Appendix C, which places a $1,285 limit per household on fixed wireless project proposals but a whopping $15,650 limit (12x higher) per household for fiber-based projects for ministerial review, based solely on technology type.

GeoLinks urges the Commission to impose a review process that puts all providers on an equal footing to ensure competition amongst CASF applicants.  Specifically, GeoLinks asserts that the Commission must ensure an apples-to-apples comparison when evaluating CASF applications (the total price/ offering regardless of technology) and not an apples-to-fiber comparison that gives more expensive business models a leg up for no reason other than these projects have traditionally been more expensive in the past.  This will ensure that CASF projects costs stay low yet will translate to better use of funds and additional funds for additional projects.


Based on the foregoing, GeoLinks urges the Commission to adopt changes that ensure flexibility for competitive carriers, technology neutral administration of the program, incentives for participation, and prevent gaming of the program to block competition.







Respectfully submitted,


/s/ Melissa Slawson


Melissa Slawson

General Counsel, V.P. of Government Affairs and Education

California Internet, L.P. dba GeoLinks

251 Camarillo Ranch Rd

Camarillo, CA 93012


April 16, 2018

[1] For more information about fixed-wireless technology and GeoLinks’ Clearfiber™ network, visit
[2] Ruling, Appendix C, at 9-10.
[3] Id., at 13.
[4] Id., at 13
[5] See Id., at 14.
[6] Interim Opinion Implementing California Advanced Services Fund, Decision 07-12-054 (rel. December 20, 2007), at 8: “The CASF shall be administered on a technology neutral basis by the Commission.”  See also Id. At 28: “CASF funding proposals will be reviewed based upon how well they meet the criteria for selection as set forth below, and, where applicable, compared with any competing claims to match the deployment offer under superior terms. Such criteria should be evaluated on a competitively neutral basis.” (Emphasis added).
[7] Ruling at 6.
[8] See Communications_-_Telecommunications_and_Broadband/ConsortiaPriorityAreas(1).xlsx (last visited April 12, 2018).
[9] Chapter 851, Statutes of 2017.
[10] Ruling, Appendix C, at 16.
[11] Connect America Fund, et al. Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Seventh Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., FCC 14-54 (rel. June 10, 2014), at para. 60.
[12] Frontier notice “CAF II Census Blocks – Desert Shores” (Feb. 6, 2018).
[13] Frontier CASF Broadband Infrastructure Grant Application – Desert Shores (Feb. 7, 2018).
[14] Rule 1.1., Rules of Practice and Procedure.
[15] Ruling, Appendix C, at 18.

GeoLinks Teams with QOS Networks for SD-WAN

PRESS RELEASE — CHANNEL PARTNERS CONFERENCE & EXPO — April 17, 2018 — Innovative telecommunications company, GeoLinks (booth #4041), is excited to officially publicize its partnership with managed network services provider, QOS Networks. The strategic collaboration further enhances GeoLinks’ diverse portfolio enabling the telecom to deliver fully-supported Software-Defined Wide Area Networking (SD-WAN) to partners  seeking enterprise or optimized WAN management.

Powered by VeloCloud, GeoLinks’ SD-WAN offering will enable its partners to offer a 100% wireless solution utilizing ClearFiber™ along with Verizon Wireless LTE forfailover. QOS Networks will be handling the device’s provisioning, programming, and technical support.

“As cloud adoption heats up the market, so does the need for flexible connectivity, and the QOS Networks partnership with GeoLinks represents the best of both worlds for progressive companies,” said QOS Networks’ Chief Executive Officer Frank Cittadino.

Together, QOS and GeoLinks will enable customers to seamlessly take advantage of next gen technology to deliver a multi-platform user defined wide area network.

“It is GeoLinks’ goal to be our channel partners go-to provider for all things telecom,” said GeoLinks’ Chief Strategy Officer Phillip Deneef. “QOS has been a longtime partner of VeloCloud and is recognized for being an early SD-WAN adopter throughout the industry. At GeoLinks we strive to offer the absolute best solutions possible. We knew that by partnering with the industry’s SD-WAN experts, and layering in Verizon wireless LTE failover with our ClearFiber™ product, we are truly delivering the best SD-WAN solution available on the market.”

GeoLinks will officially roll out SD-WAN to the channel at Channel Partners Conference and Expo April 17th through 20th in Las Vegas, Nevada. To learn more about the partnership or product offering, stop by GeoLinks’ Booth 4041 or schedule a 1:1 meeting with GeoLinks’ leadership in the Company’s private meeting suite.

For questions or meeting requests please contact Lexie Olson, at [email protected]

About GeoLinks
Headquartered in Southern California, GeoLinks is a leading telecommunications company and competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) public utility, nationally recognized for its innovative Internet and Hosted Voice solutions. Ranked No. 5 by category on Inc. Magazine’s 2017 Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Companies in America, GeoLinks delivers Enterprise-Grade Internet, Layer 2 Transport, Hosted Voice, and both Public and Private Turnkey Network Construction expertly tailored for businesses and Anchor Institutions nationwide.

GeoLinks’ accelerated success is largely due to its flagship product, ClearFiber™, which offers dedicated business-class Internet with unlimited bandwidth, true network redundancy, and guaranteed speeds reaching up to 10 Gbps. Named “Most Disruptive Technology” in the 2018 Central Coast Innovation Awards, GeoLinks’ ClearFiber™ network is backed by a carrier-grade Service Level Agreement boasting 99.999% uptime and 24/7 in-house customer support. With an average installation period of 4 to 7 days, GeoLinks is proud to offer the most resilient and scalable fixed wireless network on the market.

About QOS
QOS Networks is a leading managed services provider that is transforming software-defined wide area network (SD-WAN) infrastructure with simple, secure, and highly reliable
deployment solutions for optimization at the WAN edge. Our high-value approach to SD-WAN configuration for distributed enterprises serves leading organizations in banking, insurance, hospitality, telecom, retail, technology and transportation industries. QOS Networks supports its customers with world class support, SD-WAN professional services and hybrid cloud access expertise. For more information, please visit

Coffee with Craig & Kevin Podcast Featuring GeoLinks’ Skyler Ditchfield

Coffee with Craig & Kevin Episode No. 36: Avant, GeoLinks, #CPExpo Pre-Show Edition

The Channel Partners Conference & Expo is upon us, and to celebrate, Craig and Kevin welcome their old colleague, Rick Reed, now heading up sales for Avant in the master agent’s South Central region.

Also on the show is Skyler Ditchfield, CEO of GeoLinks, a first-time Channel Partners exhibitor, who talks about his company’s huge growth what they have planned for #CPExpo.

All that, plus the guys break down a few of the highlights of the upcoming conference and share some deep thoughts — metaphors that tie rap music into the Channel Partners show. Yes, rap. He didn’t just say what I think he did, did he?

Subscribe to us on iTunes or via SoundCloud.

Follow Craig and Kevin on the brand-new Coffee with Craig & Kevin Twitter page!

How Can Your Company Benefit from Hosted Voice?

GeoLinks_Hosted Voice

Technology is evolving rapidly, and the way we communicate is going through significant changes. Traditional PBX systems, for example, are getting replaced more and more by Hosted Voice systems which provide cutting-edge features at a much lower cost.

First adapted by large businesses and corporations, this enterprise technology has become not only practical, but invaluable for businesses of all sizes, especially small to medium-sized companies looking to improve overall business efficiencies.

So, how can your company benefit from Hosted Voice?

The Cost

Hosted Voice systems cost significantly less than traditional PBX systems. For example, GeoLinks’ Hosted Voice for business allows companies to save up to 40% when compared to traditional business phone systems. How? For starters, there is no need to keep and maintain expensive equipment on site. GeoLinks’ phone system is hosted in the cloud in carrier-grade data centers offering multiple layers of redundancy as well as high security levels. Customers can make any changes and modifications through their personal portal, without having to pay for an on-site technician.

Enterprise-Grade Features

Hosted Voice systems offer a variety of enterprise-grade features that can help increase productivity amongst your employees. Some of the most popular features of Hosted Voice include:

  • Auto attendant
  • Call queues
  • Call recording
  • Voicemail to email
  • Fax to email
  • Conference calling
  • Follow me

… and more!

Perhaps one of the most substantial benefits to Hosted Voice is that it offers advanced unified communications aptly tailored to fit your organization’s specific needs. Unified Communications, (UCaaS), enables your employees to take work with them wherever they go via a desktop and mobile app. With the ability to make and receive calls from their computer or mobile device, employees never have to risk missing a business call when they are away from their desk or out of the office. The ability to remain connected further helps companies streamline and enhance internal communications.

Security and Reliability

When choosing to implement a Hosted Voice system, consider that your provider will be completely responsible for assuring your system’s security. This means that your system will be constantly monitored and regularly backed up to the cloud, so that even if a potential problem does emerge, your settings remain protected. However, because the provider will manage and maintain all aspects of your company’s phone system, make sure you hire a reputable service provider, like GeoLinks. Aside from having award-winning 24/7 in-house customer support, GeoLinks’ team of expert engineers customizes each customer’s internal network to issue priority to voice. Additionally, for advanced reliability, a customer’s internal infrastructure can be configured so that the primary Internet connection will fail over to the secondary one in case of an Internet outage which means your voice service will remain intact.

Flexibility and Scalability

Hosted Voice systems provide true scalability options that simply aren’t possible with traditional business phones. With no physical hardware on your site, when you need an upgrade or decide to add additional lines or features, the entire process becomes instant, simple and does not require a technician’s presence. Customers can easily scale the phone system and adapt it to how their business changes and grows.

When security, productivity, flexibility, and scalability matter to a business, Hosted Voice, also known as Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP), provides businesses of all sizes the ability to enjoy fully-managed enterprise benefits at a fraction of the cost of traditional PBX systems.

Camarillo-based GeoLinks acquires broadband provider Vectus

Original Article

Camarillo-based GeoLinks has acquired Southern California fixed wireless broadband provider Vectus.

The acquisition includes an outright procurement of the internet service provider’s fixed wireless network, key staff and existing customer base ultimately expanding GeoLinks’ existing ClearFiber™ network and coverage map.

The Vectus network offers dense coverage throughout Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino and Los Angeles counties.

“With founding roots in Southern California, GeoLinks has been familiar with Vectus’ robust wireless network for quite some time,” said GeoLinks CEO Skyler Ditchfield. “When the opportunity to officially acquire Vectus came to the table, all parties knew immediately that merging networks would be seamless from an operations standpoint, and prove immensely beneficial to existing and future clientele. With contracts finalized, company migration will commence immediately, enabling GeoLinks to further expand its coverage map while simultaneously increasing our overall network capacity, redundancy and ability to deliver higher bandwidth.”

David Saylor, president and chief technology officer of Vectus, said: “Post-acquisition, I have full confidence that all existing Vectus customers will continue to receive the same exceptional service they’ve become accustomed to. At our cores, GeoLinks and Vectus have synergistic beliefs — always put the customer first. By combining assets, all current and future customers will now have access to an even more resilient and redundant wireless network.”

The companies’ clients will encounter no disruptions of service during the network transition, GeoLinks said.